Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: If You Thought Smoking Bans Were Tough

  1. #1
    Inactive Member cincygreg's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 17th, 2001
    Posts
    7,366
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)
    Check this out...

    Kim Walker / AP file
    New York City health officials have proposed a ban on artificial trans fats that can be found in foods like doughnuts and french fries.

    Updated: 2:50 a.m. PT Sept 27, 2006
    NEW YORK - Three years after the city banned smoking in restaurants, health officials are talking about prohibiting something they say is almost as bad: artificial trans fatty acids.

    The city health department unveiled a proposal Tuesday that would bar cooks at any of the city?s 24,600 food service establishments from using ingredients that contain the artery-clogging substance, commonly listed on food labels as partially hydrogenated oil.

    Artificial trans fats are found in some shortenings, margarine and frying oils and turn up in foods from pie crusts to french fries to doughnuts.

    Doctors agree that trans fats are unhealthy in nearly any amount, but a spokesman for the restaurant industry said he was stunned the city would seek to ban a legal ingredient found in millions of American kitchens.

    ?Labeling is one thing, but when they totally ban a product, it goes well beyond what we think is prudent and acceptable,? said Chuck Hunt, executive vice president of the city?s chapter of the New York State Restaurant Association.

    He said the proposal could create havoc: Cooks would be forced to discard old recipes and scrutinize every ingredient in their pantry. A restaurant could face a fine if an inspector finds the wrong type of vegetable shortening on its shelves.

    The proposal also would create a huge problem fo

    New York City health officials have proposed a ban on artificial trans fats that can be found in foods like doughnuts and french fries.

    r national chains. Among the fast foods that would need to get an overhaul or face a ban: McDonald?s french fries, Kentucky Fried Chicken and several varieties of Dunkin? Donuts.

    Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden acknowledged that the ban would be a challenge for restaurants, but he said trans fats can easily be replaced with substitute oils that taste the same or better and are far less unhealthy.

    ?It is a dangerous and unnecessary ingredient,? Frieden said. ?No one will miss it when it?s gone.?

    Same ban in Chicago?
    A similar ban on trans fats in restaurant food has been proposed in Chicago and is still under consideration, although it has been ridiculed by some as unnecessary government meddling.

    The latest version of the Chicago plan would only apply to companies with annual revenues of more than $20 million, a provision aimed exclusively at fast-food giants.

    A few companies have moved to eliminate trans fats on their own.

    Wendy?s announced in August that it had switched to a new cooking oil that contains no trans fatty acids. Crisco now sells a shortening that contains zero trans fats. Frito-Lay removed trans fats from its Doritos and Cheetos. Kraft?s took trans fats out of Oreos.

    McDonald?s began using a trans fat-free cooking oil in Denmark after that country banned artificial trans fats in processed food, but it has yet to do so in the United States.

    Walt Riker, vice president of corporate communications at McDonald?s, said in a statement Tuesday that the company would review New York?s proposal.

    ?McDonald?s knows this is an important issue, which is why we continue to test in earnest to find ways to further reduce (trans fatty acid) levels,? he said.

    July deadline proposed
    Under the New York proposal, restaurants would need to get artificial trans fats out of cooking oils, margarine and shortening by July 1, 2007, and all other foodstuffs by July 1, 2008. It would not affect grocery stores. It also would not apply to naturally occurring trans fats, which are found in some meats and dairy.

    The Board of Health has yet to approve the proposal and will not do so until at least December, Frieden said.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration began requiring food labels to list trans fats in January.

    Dr. Walter Willett, chairman of the Department of Nutrition at the Harvard University School of Public Health, praised New York health officials for considering a ban, which he said could save lives.

    ?Artificial trans fats are very toxic, and they almost surely causes tens of thousands of premature deaths each year,? he said. ?The federal government should have done this long ago.?

    What would be the charges brought against someone who used trans fats?

    Illegal use of shortening? [img]graemlins/hmmm.gif[/img]
    Possesion on an banned substance? [img]graemlins/sure.gif[/img]
    Driving under the influence, of cream filling? [img]graemlins/wonder.gif[/img]
    Abuse of your wasteline? [img]eek.gif[/img]

    Would we have trans fat testing in sports?
    I'm sorry, but you've been suspended for donut eating.

  2. #2
    Inactive Member Gunslinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 28th, 2004
    Posts
    400
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Ok, why in the world is the gov't trying to regulate what I eat?!

    I can't say I am surprised at this though. I called it years ago after the tobacco companies were sued for millions.

    No one is forcing people to eat foods that contain trans fat. Why can't people just accept the consequences of their actions instead of trying to get the gov't to regulate how we live.

    What's next, a ban on caffeine and junk food?

    God, people are retarded.

  3. #3
    Inactive Member cincygreg's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 17th, 2001
    Posts
    7,366
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Post

    I can just see it now.

    Black market krispy kream shops openeing in dark allaeys and abandoned buildings. [img]eek.gif[/img]

    Men in trenchcoats opening the trunks of their cars to show a cachet of hostess products [img]graemlins/hmmm.gif[/img]

    Offices where fake bottom drawers conciel bags of cookies [img]graemlins/sure.gif[/img]

    Or worse yet....


    Scores of people crossing state lines and attemtpting to illegally bring back pasries from neighboring states. [img]graemlins/sure.gif[/img]
    Being stopped by the border patrol and possibly being extridited to their home state to stand trial for trafficing cupcakes [img]eek.gif[/img]

    OH THE HUMANITY!

  4. #4
    HB Forum Owner gae's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 16th, 2001
    Posts
    2,552
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    What's next, a ban on caffeine and junk food?
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yep. The 'fat tax' has been discused for the last oh, 10 or 12 years as far as I know. And the manufacturers whose products would be affected spend a LOT of money lobbying against it.

  5. #5
    Inactive Member cincygreg's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 17th, 2001
    Posts
    7,366
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Post

    What do you suppose would happen if you got caught smoking a trans fat? [img]eek.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/hmmm.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/sure.gif[/img]

    <font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ September 28, 2006 03:38 PM: Message edited by: cincygreg ]</font>

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •